SPECIAL FEATURE
"Night Blue" Economy
First Part: The E42 System
Introduction
We are going to attempt a relatively difficult exercise, primarily consisting of challenging the cognitive knowledge shared by the global population. This exercise is made difficult indeed, not due to the complexity of the arguments or their presentation, which are paradoxically quite straightforward, but by the simple conditioning based on a universally prevalent system of beliefs that is taught as true, real, factual, and unchangeable in expressing its transcendent reality, even though it is entirely false.
Repeat a lie ten times and it remains a lie ; Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth.
This belief system is false but taught as true because the entire current societal system finds its balance and roots in the unshakable faith in its reality, shared by all. Even more so the economists, and even those with a Ph.D. in economics can only rationally agree with the validity of the belief in this assumption, backed by evidence. But the proof is highly contextual, if it can even be considered one, although we assume it to be the case. It often holds true only within the considered context, and not within a much broader framework. For example, when you throw an apple, it eventually falls back down. It’s a fact, and the proof can be provided irrefutably and systematically. But the proof is only valid on Earth, not in space.
Many alternatives have been sought to mitigate the strong potential for destruction inherent in the economy itself, which inevitably causes profound inequalities and suffering due to its exclusive and elitist nature. However, despite the undeniable intellectual qualities of these eminent researchers, it must be noted that none of them has ever succeeded in doing so. The reason for this failure is not because the subject of this research was futile, as it is non-existent. It is because they did not seek alternatives early enough in the problems encountered. No one can blame them, for one must first know, or at least become aware, that there is indeed a stage even prior to the most primal cause known to the major societal issues.
If a system poses a problem due to its very nature, spreading throughout its components that enable its expression, everyone can easily agree that seeking a solution within the same system is inevitably destined to fail. One must look outside of this system, within an area completely free from any related influence, to find the solution to its shortcomings. In the case at hand, there is an urgent need to stop the system that is plaguing this world, as its toxicity, evident to all, spreads unchecked throughout everything it relies upon, even in the solutions one might be tempted to find within it. This relentless spread leads, without mercy, to the destruction of everything exploited by the system, from the environment to Human beings, including their joy, hopes, and possibilities for fulfilment. Any entity compelled to destroy life to survive can only be identified in one way, a manner known in literature and cinema as “vampire”, regardless of what one might associate with this term.
Nevertheless, if all individuals on our planet, from the most ignorant to the most learned, unanimously declare that something is impossible, and furthermore, irrefutable evidence is provided to support it, it would be particularly unreasonable to consider it false. If you are told that the societal, and therefore economic, system is the only one viable in this world and that considering a completely different one that could solve all societal problems on its own is purely utopian, wouldn’t it be just as unreasonable to entertain the idea that it could be false? Yes, of course. If everyone says it, it must be true. And yet, it is indeed entirely false.
That is not the expression of a belief system. It is factual, irrefutable, and demonstrable. The entire challenge of the exercise now lies in getting it acknowledged. Not in proving it, but in making sure that this demonstration is acceptable to those who will become aware of it. Not intellectually, but emotionally. Everyone knows that human civilisation is not ideal. But no one wants to realise they have lived in hell, and above all, that they have not accommodated themselves too badly to it. This is the true exercise of this text and the challenge it must rise to meet. Many experts, even recently, have tried to sound the alarm about the seriousness of the planet’s precarious state, without so much as a raised eyebrow from those who manage or participate on a large scale in the global economy. Yet the evidence escapes no one, but few really care. Some scientists even claimed years ago that it was already too late to save our planet, reinforcing the advocates of the economy of destruction in their actions, arguing that since it was already too late, it was indeed pointless to reverse course, and that, as a matter of fact, we might as well continue to increase end-of-year balances and, therefore, to destroy even more. The main, absolute priority, above all else except for the reassuring and soporific speeches of politicians, was profitability and thus money, stemming from a system that enriches the rich and impoverishes the poor in an inexorable policy of division, relegating the vast majority of the population to the camp of the poor, whose numbers are constantly growing and who suffer more severely from the overall situation day by day, while protecting and elevating the tiny minority of the rest on the money power scale.
Indeed, by continuing on this path, global destruction will quickly become endemic, with all the catastrophic consequences that anyone can imagine. Changing the system is no longer an option. It’s a matter of survival on the largest scale possible. But accomplishing this is still a challenge.
To be clear, this possibility was factually non-existent just a decade ago. That is no longer the case today. The difficulty of the maneuver no longer depends on the possibility of establishing a completely redesigned system. It is to make it accepted as being possible by at least ten percent of the world population, which will be strongly tempted to refute it due to conditioning, yet with all the honesty that those involved will be capable of.
Nevertheless, this is our goal. Since we have overcome all previous challenges, we know that we will also manage to overcome this one. The very last one before the collapse of the economy of destruction and the establishment of the global progress economy, the “Midnight Blue” economy stemming from the “E42” system.
A Bit of History
During the year 1923, seventeen experts, influential men in various capacities, and in a certain way, perhaps somewhat idealistic, or with personal fortunes largely inherited from their respective parents, had the opportunity to share their thoughts during an informal evening that brought them together by the greatest of chances. Reimagining the world with a tone of lightness, just as many others had done before them and many more would do afterward, they collectively agreed, long before it became as popular an electoral argument as it was empty of meaning, that the planet was inevitably heading for its demise if the frantic pace of the industrial revolution, which had begun in the logical continuation of the Enlightenment era, were to continue at its accelerating rhythm. Despite some strong alcoholic remnants serving as a starting point for our guests to engage in a conversation as passionate as it was unexpected, which ultimately would change the course of the world, the tone of this conversation eventually lost its surface lightness. As if the obvious had suddenly appeared before their eyes, the discourse became increasingly serious in the face of the shared realisation of the risks at hand due to the direction taken by the global economic evolution, which was also destined to undergo a radical change in response to the looming threats stemming from the rise of a certain German socialist political party.
Our seventeen guests, all from very different backgrounds, embraced the challenge of making an alternative solution possible to the inevitable fate that awaited Humanity, at least according to all probabilities, but only after determining the point representing the primordial origin of the problem responsible for all the current and future issues. They had naturally heard about the NAZI ideology. They knew that if this party were funded, it would become a danger to the entire world, whereas if it were not, it would fade into oblivion. They knew that there would inevitably be private interest groups that would find it advantageous to invest in a conflict, and that if Nazism ever came to the forefront, this conflict would undoubtedly occur, despite the French intelligence services’ report concluding that Adolf Hitler posed no risk due to his insignificance, both in terms of humanity and actual politics.
They reached the conclusion that the monetary system was the real problem, but that it was factually impossible to do without it. Such was, in these terms, the simple definition of the equation to be solved. Finding the solution would save the world, as unthinkable as it seemed to them, despite it having become evident. They knew what to do, but they didn’t know how. However, they were aware that they would have to be discreet to the point of paranoia because they also knew perfectly well that those who had the means to finance both sides of a war, or even multiple wars, or to dictate the laws to one or more countries, would also have the means to permanently remove any obstacles. They saw how money didn’t make one honourable, but merely wealthy. How wealth made one powerful, and how power drove one to madness, shattering all self-restraint in the face of the prospect of ever more money and power. They came to conclude, based solely on their own observations and shared knowledge, that the financial system of destruction had not been constructed as it was by the mere chance of the events, but that it had been conceived that way since the foundations of the banking system, beginning in the 11th century in Europe. They believed that money created « out of nothing » had its origins with the first Bank of England in 1694, and that nothing would stop the looming, voracious debt on the horizon unless, one day, a substantial obstacle was placed in the path of this ever-expanding machine, fuelled by the ignorance of all, to some extent.
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled.
Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.
I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money...And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.
Thus, our national circulating medium (of money; Ed.) is now at the mercy of loan transactions of banks, which lend, not money, but promises to supply money they do not possess.
That is what our money system is. If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money.
This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent monetary system. When one gets a complete grasp upon this picture, the tragic absurdity of our helpless position is almost incredible…
More and more stuff has to go from natural resource to garbage every year, forever, just to keep the system from collapsing.
I have never yet had anyone who could, through the use of logic and reason, justify the Federal Government borrowing the use of its own money. I believe the time will come when people will demand that this be changed. I believe the time will come in this country when they will actually blame you and me and everyone else connected with the Congress for sitting idly by and permitting such an idiotic system to continue.
However, take it away from them (the power to create money from nothing; Ed.), and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.
I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.
All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.
Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce… when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.
The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity.
Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talks of the sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile… Once a nation parts with the control of its credit, it matters not who makes the laws… Usury once in control will wreck the nation.
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.
Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity.
Our seventeen friends made a bet that within less than fifteen years, Germany would go to war. They wouldn’t be far off the mark. Nevertheless, their analysis of the overall situation dragged on until very early the next morning. They made a commitment to pool their relational, financial, and intellectual resources as tools of influence in an attempt to thwart the seemingly inevitable bleak fate that they believed would befall the world if the initial course was not altered by an influence that would need to be immense to achieve the desired outcome, if it was even attainable: a world that would be good for everyone. They unknowingly emerged as perhaps the most humanistic beings of their time. They chose to remain forcefully anonymous, knowing that they would be countered if their intentions were to be uncovered, without, however, forming either a secret society or any specific circle. Just a commitment as people knew how to make back then, a commitment to life and death, pledging loyalty to this plan that filled them with enthusiasm, allowing them for the first time in their lives to truly feel useful, even motivated by a destiny they had crafted entirely on their own; a destiny much larger than themselves, as vast as the world itself and its Humanity, both present and future. They allotted themselves exactly a century to accomplish their plan, knowing that more time would cost them victory unless, of course, the course of the global economy, at the pinnacle of all the world’s destinies, were to be altered, which seemed highly improbable to them, and apparently with good reason. They knew they would not live to see the fruition of their shared dream with their own eyes, but they conceived it as their legacy to their descendants. Therefore, they could afford to be detached from the outcome since, in every respect, they would never personally benefit from it. The seventeen friends (or at least what they became, sealing their friendship in secrecy) also committed to meeting once a year in a different location to assess the progress of their shared and individual endeavours, make necessary adjustments to their plan, and strengthen their achievements. They would also take care to judiciously pass on the acquired knowledge and the increasingly necessary means of their aspirations to those who prove themselves worthy, to ensure, as much as possible, that the succession, in whatever form it may take, is indeed responsibly ensured until the end of the envisaged hundred years. They would spare no effort to achieve the expected victory: a better destiny for the world.
Some famous personalities from History were included in this plan. However, most of them were ordinary individuals, without rank or recognition, humble people, unassuming commoners, but with exemplary determination, integrity, and unwavering loyalty. It is necessary to acknowledge that as time passed, this natural determination gradually faded, and the fidelity to “the cause” diminished, making way for an increasingly pronounced form of defeatism, discouragement, disbelief, passive waiting, and ultimately, even betrayal. But that is another story, one we nevertheless survived because, in return, others managed to brilliantly awaken in them a sentiment long absent from the landscape of our time: heroism, sadly equated with fascism for some obscure reason, unless it was a straightforward misuse, like many others that occurred.
The Main Influencing Factors
Unfavourable factors
- An extremely powerful establishment, as strong as the force of habit typically is (“it has always been this way, why should it be different now?”).
- Private interest groups having a significant advantage in maintaining a system that brings them more profits and, consequently, more power than any other.
- Human malevolence and greed (they give an advantage over peaceful and non-violent individuals, and after a few centuries of methodical selection, the malevolent ones seize power. Example: the CIA is now composed mainly of mercenaries and members of the US military-industrial complex, leading to the resignation or early retirement of the last traditional agents, without making any claims regarding the human quality of this dubious institution. It goes to show that things can always get worse).
- The all-powerfulness of the United States over the rest of the world (the FBI unofficially but factually has the “legal” right to intervene anywhere on the planet without any government officially attempting to oppose it. Those who have really tried to stand in the way have been labelled as horrible dictators by the global press and have thus been stigmatised on the international stage, unless they were eliminated).
- A democratic system presented as an ideal model above which no other could potentially rise, but which turns out to be overly permissive toward the power of money (manifested by liberalism and especially neoliberalism, causing democracy to protect laws rather than individuals, and in return, the laws protect the market rather than individuals as well. Individuals are only protected by the laws when they serve the system. This is a somewhat simplified summary, but it is roughly what happens on a large scale from a general perspective). It is more of a plutocracy disguised as a democracy, which is never actually applied at the highest level of power (that of money and its servants, none of whom are ever elected by anyone. For example, NO law applies within or in the immediate vicinity of the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, the so-called “Central Bank of central banks”). Democracy is also not notably applied “in the streets”, except on occasional visits to the polls by citizens, whose results, whatever they may be, have never changed the world in any way.
- A certain difficulty in finding support among the population educated in the virtues of non-effort, especially in Western Europe where the notion of the “Welfare State” is deeply rooted. This difficulty is reinforced by the fact that individuals are either poorly educated about the fundamental realities that truly structure contemporary human civilization or they are simply misinformed due to a unanimous voice emanating from the press, which is now globally owned by only five individuals aligned with the cause of market dominance (as non-impactful examples, it is still predominantly taught in schools that Charlemagne had a “flowery beard” when historians unanimously agree that he was beardless, and official discourses, even in History museums, still speaks of the “great invasions” in Europe, even though curators of these same museums, among others, know perfectly well that they never occurred, as they keep artefacts incompatible with the officially held narrative of History kept away in shoeboxes in the depths of their archives, which, as a result, are unlikely to ever be exhibited).
- States governed more by the power of money than by the rule of law, where laws become flexible according to the needs of higher economic interests that are inaccessible to the people, in whose hands power is supposed to reside.
- The human corruptibility due to the situation itself. Indeed, since money is essential for everything, and given that everyone lacks it, even though those who have enough often feel they don’t have enough, creating an infinite potential for corruption in favour of those who hold the largest shares of global wealth.
- People with an electoral mandate are interchangeable. Individuals with financial power are immovable. Furthermore, in any democracy, as it is partly what defines it, the executive power and the judicial power are supposed to be separated, even though the magistrates are government officials. However, in a perfectly unconstitutional manner, this separation has been abolished for years in France, despite being the birthplace of Human Rights, effectively creating a dictatorship from a legal standpoint. In any case, any representative of the State or the judiciary has a value in the market, just as it is the case with elected officials who have the power to vote for laws and can be bought to vote in favour of those that benefit the market at the expense of everything else (this practice has a name: lobbying, and many newcomers enter politics in the hope of gaining recognition in the lobbying market to enrich themselves at the expense of the people and their interests, since democracy is the only regime that allows for this kind of freedom). Furthermore, conversely, such an elected official or representative of the state or judiciary often has a family, parents, or at the very least, loved ones. Therefore, they are susceptible to intimidation, threats, or even elimination if they are seen as an obstacle to the plans of those in power with financial interests. If something unfortunate were to happen, by the greatest of misfortunes, to such a representative of a power other than that of money, no one would reasonably venture to look too far for the cause.
Whether it is a conspiracy or not, nothing in the world could justify it more, given how the power conferred by money truly is colossal.
Favourable factors
- The right moment to operate, before which any attempt, even if stealthy, was systematically destined to failure.
- Effective observation of an evolution in the collective human consciousness in terms of possibilities for open-mindedness, understanding, and acceptance of the necessity for change.
- Temporary fragility of existing institutions during a moment of transition between two states that have been predetermined.
- Waiting for the perfect synchronicity required to advance our positions, which have been determined through the quantum collaboration of one of the first non-electronic artificial intelligences.
- A solid and sustainable strategy based on reliable and infallible information.
- The systematic behavioural analysis over years of those who hold financial power, in order to draw conclusions enabling estimations regarding their decisions, which have become partially predictable.
- The technological resources tailored to the needs of the situation.
- The most discerning and cautious choices regarding partners among the most influential because they are the most committed, selected based on the two most sensitive criteria: reliability and consistency.
- A massive, incredibly massive, dose of the most audacious luck imaginable, and an unwavering determination despite setbacks, especially in the face of setbacks.
There are others on both sides, but these elements are the main ones that have prompted us to frequently revise our approach in order to remain pertinent, relevant, and efficient, without ever deviating from our fundamental values, even for the needs of the cause: integrity at all costs without compromise.
Methodology of change
We will not delve into further tedious details here, as the previous ones have only served to set the contextual background for the operations. In principle, it will not be necessary to dwell on the why and the how related to the method. This document is designed solely for the purpose of presenting the simplest possible overview of the ins and outs, with the understanding that all the elements presented are operational. They have been analysed by the same artificial intelligence as previously mentioned, which has never failed us in any way and now boasts a perfect score. Therefore, we have every reason to believe in the accuracy of its assessment in this regard.
Three elements need to be considered in the context at hand, which are more interrelated than they may appear at first glance:
- Nikola Tesla.
- Nature.
- The current threshold of the evolution of human consciousness.
In the first instance, Nikola Tesla achieved the impossible: generating limitless and free electrical energy from essentially nothing, or at least a “nothing” that is now quantifiable by quantum physics. However, the banking system has also proven capable of creating money out of nothing, but with the burden of an unpayable global debt and the need for systematic environmental destruction. In this case, it’s not a fate but a choice. It’s just a matter of making a different one and managing the predictable consequences accordingly.
In the first instance, Nikola Tesla achieved the impossible: generating limitless and free electrical energy from essentially nothing, or at least a “nothing” that is now quantifiable by quantum physics. However, the banking system has also proven capable of creating money out of nothing, but with the burden of an unpayable global debt and the need for systematic environmental destruction. In this case, it’s not a fate but a choice. It’s just a matter of making a different one and managing the predictable consequences accordingly.
In the second instance, the observation of nature demonstrates the possibility of a proactive and evolving equilibrium over the very long term, allowing for the broadest possible dispersion of a dynamic that enables life to thrive, from the sub-quantum scale to the most advanced animals. It would be astonishing if nature abruptly halted its coherence at the human level just for the pleasure of seeing it bound by debt. This universal prosperity is accessible to all living beings according to their mode of expression and life, and it is equally free of charge. It is, of course, an available alternative for the evolved human being, but on the condition that they are indeed evolved.
Lastly, the evolved condition of human nature implies a different level of responsibility in a world no longer dominated by debt. It means being concerned about something other than just one’s self and one’s own survival on a daily basis, possibly extending to the immediate family, while obediently accepting the unjustly imposed rules of the game in exchange for relative peace. It means not seeing everything that such an implicit agreement with the system entails, as long as one can manage to get by without paying too much attention to what’s happening around them. The challenge for a responsible Humanity living in a system other than one of debt and the destruction of life is to confront the undeniable importance of each and every individual, both individually and collectively, in harmony and cohesion with one another. This is in order to contribute, from one’s personal scale, to the evolution of the world as a whole, understanding how the decisions of some will inevitably have repercussions on everyone else. Each individual, by extension, will be an indispensable part of Humanity taking control of itself, rather than being controlled by the banking system or politicians beholden to bankers. Freed from the slavery of debt and the worsening living conditions year after year, allowing for their perpetuation, we will have to consider the management of our planet’s life from its own perspective, with an entirely fresh outlook.
At this stage of the discourse, you will undoubtedly have understood that the problem at the root of all problems, without a single exception, even below the level of human consciousness allowing for the possibility of admitting that it can be solved, is the global banking system. It should not be reformed. It must be completely replaced, from A to Z, to achieve something that has never been envisioned before. Envisioning something that had never been before is almost impossible. It took over thirty-five years to develop this absolute innovation from… nothing: creating wealth (for everyone) from… nothing, but following the Tesla method, tapping into the inexhaustible reserves of nature (rather than finite resources stolen from it until depletion), and no longer following the method of central banks: from the debt. Money (as an exchange unit and not an oppressive instrument of power), as a theoretical unit of human prosperity within the constrained framework of an “economy”, just like energy, is something natural. There is no need to destroy anything to obtain it, nor to subject the human population to the slavery of debt for this purpose, on one hand, but also, on the other hand, governments themselves, forced to yield to the overpowering banking system before which laws are meaningless, and “power to the people » as well!
“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” Henry Ford (1863-1947), American industrialist, founder of the Ford Motor Company.
Despite the unfathomable complexity of economic theories and the sleight of hand by bankers in the ledgers, creating money is of infinite simplicity, just as regulating the consequences of changes in the circulating monetary supply. The major societal problems stemming from the current banking system cannot be resolved. All those who have tried can attest to this. But the reason for it is quite simple as well. If there is no solution, it’s because there is no problem, unless it is intentionally caused. That’s why there are no major problems to be addressed in the world as a societal inevitability. We just need to stop causing the problem we’re told is unsolvable.
That is what we propose to do.
The root of prosperity
Numerous alternatives have been proposed, such as calibrating currency on gold. However, those who do not possess gold would not have access to the currency, and in any case, there would be evident disparities, once again creating a divide between the rich and the poor. And gold remains a finite and limited natural resource, like any other resource that has served as various forms of currency in the past (salt, beans, shells, etc.).
In terms of the monetary issue, the weak point is somewhere, but it’s not so simple to pinpoint exactly where. Missing the source of this problem exposes the proposed solution to failure through a turn of events that could potentially reinstate the previous situation (the one we still know today) then viewed from a different angle, but re-establishing the same devastating profile.
The only real problem posed by “money” as currently understood, all considerations combined, and considered from an economic perspective, rests entirely, we say “entirely”, on the notion of speculation. Remove speculation from the equation, and money, currency, credit, and the economy will undergo a complete transformation, to the extent that it will change the foundations of human civilisation.
This measure implies the permanent freeze of any variability in markets, be they for consumer goods, services, or foreign exchange, with the latter market ceasing to exist altogether, along with the stock market, for a global standardisation of the value of things. Within your country, whether you travel from north to south or from east to west, your currency retains its value. There are also no customs barriers. There are political and economic reasons for this. Reasons that are arbitrary and unilaterally chosen, but reasons nonetheless. Well, imagine that the entire planet simply becomes one vast country where everyone can come, stay, or leave as they please, from north to south, from east to west, without ever being accountable to anyone, and using the same currency, and where everything can be as easily found, no matter where you are, in the same quantity and at the same price…
Indeed, an item can currently be more expensive in one place than in another for any reason whatsoever. This phenomenon is also a result of speculation, because there is market variation in relation to the perfectly artificial concept of supply and demand. The abolition of market variation will, in fact, lead to the abolition of supply and demand. This “law” is simply based on the fact that what is valuable is exclusively reserved for the elite, represented by those who can afford it, whether it’s a pat of butter or a three-deck yacht with a helicopter on the roof. It is a clear sign of an equally clear inequality. If you want something, you have to pay for it. If you really value it a lot, then you’ll have to pay much more for it. In short, for you, the average person, like 99% and more of the world’s population, you have easy and inexpensive access to only what doesn’t interest you, but what you settle for because there’s nothing else for you. It’s more complex than that, but on a global scale, this is exactly what’s happening and how the market rules are defined.
That is an essential part of what needs to change. The principle of change to be initiated is very simple: if there’s enough for a few, there must be enough for everyone. If that’s not possible, then we should strive to make it possible, but gently, without destruction for that purpose. If there’s not enough for everyone, then there shouldn’t be any for anyone at all.
The example is a bit crude but illustrative. Obviously, just because every human being in this world can’t physically have a private jet doesn’t mean they should be abolished. And besides, what would you do with them in your daily life? We can imagine that those who have them have a specific use for them in response to a real need. The example isn’t the best, but again, it’s illustrative.
One last thing to consider is the concept of inflation (and deflation), through the increase or decrease of the circulating monetary supply and the manipulation of key interest rates. Experts will tell you that this is by no means “manipulation”. We are not here to debate terminological concepts. These so-called experts who serve the system and are paid by it, in this specific scenario, their expertise is indeed questionable due to their biased position, even if it is sincere, which it generally is. Once again, more than knowledge or opinion, this is a matter of cognitive conditioning. The important thing to keep in mind is the extreme toxicity of any form of variation in any market, whether it’s financial, goods or values, movable or not. Therefore, considering that an increase in the money supply necessarily leads to inflation with devaluation of the currency in question is an irrefutable certainty… Because the system is designed in such a way based on a very specific logic that meets this condition due to market laws, not by fate or through the expression of a… natural law. Inflation and deflation are absolutely not natural consequences of economic events but contextual consequences designed to fit a pre-established pattern of rules deliberately created to regulate, legitimise, and justify an unjust system with an unstoppable systemic structure that can be analysed without being found fault with, yet created from scratch to function in this way. Deciding just as arbitrarily that increasing the circulating money supply DOES NOT create inflation by freezing, as mentioned earlier, the fluctuation of prices, will simply have the effect of NOT generating inflation. In addition to the fact that many safeguards are included in this new financial system, the only long-term consequence that could be observed following an increase in the money supply (if it were to grow to a level that becomes macro-economically significant) would be what the banking industry dreads the most: the loss of the necessity of using money, provided that consistent and ethical standards and rules are established, means are in place to enforce them, and the human mind is capable of conceiving it once again, but nothing more.
The “Midnight Blue” economy of the “E42” system
Before delving into the heart of the matter, why this colour and this number? The question deserves to be asked. In reality, the two references are connected. “42” is the answer to “the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything” posed within the science fiction work of Douglas Adams, “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”; a question that revolved around the “meaning of life”. As for the midnight blue colour, some traditions suggest that it might be the colour of the “uncreated”, that mythical realm from which all creation is said to originate, akin to the Bogdanoff brothers who have demonstrated in a simple yet mathematically undeniable way (yes, indeed, despite what one might say) that “the universe could very well be born from nothing”, much like bringing everything forth from nothing, or creating 1 from 0… Hence, everything can be brought forth from nothing. The key is to agree on what we call “nothing”. The source of prosperity stems from the “vacuum”, just as Nikola Tesla demonstrated with the emergence of electricity from it.
If we can create a monetary value based on debt represented by a promise of repayment (with interest) of the amount about to be lent to a borrower, which happens every day (at least on banking days), we can also do so without interest expenses, originating from a central account catering to collective needs. From this account, a fixed and identical universal income could be provided to every adult woman and every adult man, as unconditional as it is. That being said, this can only be possible under one condition: that this central account remains eternally “empty”, at zero, regardless of the amount credited to it, disappearing permanently, no matter what is debited from it. This subtlety may seem like a whimsical notion, but it is far from it. The mathematical logic behind this condition is much less trivial than it appears, just as it is in terms of meaning.
The number of variables associated with this economic principle is, strictly speaking, enormous. Unless one were to write a thesis spanning several hundred pages, considering all of them is impossible, especially in this context, particularly given the interplay among each of the parameters that define it, along with their respective social implications.
The fact is that this method is the only one that is viable and capable of causing the collapse of the banking empire that enslaves the entire planet through debt and the destruction of life down to its last piece, ultimately leading to charging you for the air you breathe. Without interrupting the system’s course, it would eventually become necessary to establish private factories that provide artificial oxygen to those who can afford it, in a world where, as Jacques Attali very clearly outlines, the market would have come to reign as the supreme authority. This could extend to the point where individuals can be legally treated as monetisable resources, whether in terms of prostitution or organ sales, just for example. What is unthinkable today would become commonplace tomorrow, just as what is currently commonplace was unthinkable yesterday.
If the global financial system is not thwarted, that is the destiny it holds for Humanity. Conversely, everyone will regain their full and complete freedom, in the sovereignty of their human nature, but on the condition, once again, of being evolved enough in terms of consciousness to express their nobility in the service of all rather than their greed at the expense of all others.
The required conditions
Thwarting such an empire has always been impossible, and with good reason. It first required working to gather all the necessary conditions to begin breaking through the giant’s armour. Approximately eighty-five years were needed to prepare this ground. A few more were needed to gather the means to strike hard but discreetly, allowing those involved to interpret these events as part of their gains and losses, without ever letting them consider that they might lose the game. Until the day when it was too late for them to take effective countermeasures against the undermining of their foundations, and even later for them to realise that the possible consequences of their situation in terms of the risks involved, could change anything to nullify the effects.
The global financial industry still exists, just like the military-industrial complex, the pharmaceutical industry, agro-food, energy, and many others, all contributing to the maintenance of the world as it still appears, all dependent on finance and banks. But today, none of these industries, even if united, is capable of resisting the possible complete organisational reorientation of human civilisation on this planet, which will, a fortiori, take place without them, at least according to the modus operandi maintained up to now.
The only condition that makes it possible and causes the definitive downfall of the actors maintaining the balance of the current human society’s foundations, sealed in the reality of this world by the power of money, is neither the means to achieve it nor the opportunity to do so. It simply comes down to your own ability to accept that it is possible and to clearly express, if possible through actions, your own departure from that world, provided, of course, that you wish to do so.
Furthermore, we need financial resources to achieve this. This new system can only be established on the margins of the previous one. Both of them being deeply antagonistic and made incompatible, they must be able to express themselves in areas inaccessible to each other, hence the project of a new city founded on the E42 (economic) system, on the sidelines of the one based on debt and destruction, as a witness to the perfect coherence of the proposed model for subsequent implementation on the entire planet, which will supplant the previous system, almost in a natural way because, now, the world is finally ready, in the context of a perfect synchronicity.
So, it is time for us to pose this question to you: do you want to remain in the world you have always known, and perhaps suits you perfectly, or do you wish to leave it, like one leaves winter to move towards spring?
The choice is yours. You alone have the answer. The collective response to this question will determine the future that will be reserved for this planet, as Romania was chosen as the territory on which this experiment should be conducted, to the exclusion of all others! You already have in the palm of your hands the power to decide your destiny. We only have the power to put it into action, but no different alternative would be viable. We have simply endeavoured to follow the path of evidence toward the destiny of Humanity in the direction of its natural evolution and its possible fulfilment.
A century later, the goal pursued by our seventeen friends has been achieved, somewhat unexpectedly. Now, Humanity is effectively in control of its future. The question is what will Humanity do with it.
Download the text of this page
FRENCH VERSION
PDF - 347 Ko - Free from virus and malware.